Archive for the ‘Ad Networks’ Category

Best CPM Networks – Top 10

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

These are our thoughts based on networks we are part of. If you wondering about one we do not mention, we have not joined them yet.

1. Adsdaq – Been running for several months, filled 50% during holiday season , High CPM, Pick your CPM Rate, Run It first, then Right Media Second, works great! Good reporting, easy to use interface.
Adsdaq

2. Right Media – Direct Media Exchange – Been running for 6 months, Pretty High CPM, Good thing is you can set the CPM you get on other networks and they only fill if they beat the CPM you set. Great because they have many companies in there exchange network including (Xtend, Vizi Direct, Rydium, Revenue Science, Oridian, Directa Networks, Bannerconnect Networks, Active Response Group, Adtegrity, CPX Interactive, and Remix Media). They also have great reporting, and you can use them as a free ad server for any direct sales etc.
Direct Media Exchange

3. Tribal Fusion – Been running almost a year, high CPMs but hard to get into, Great pop-under CPMs, Ok Reporting
Tribal

4. Burst Media – Decent CPMs, Sometimes get direct advertisers, Good Reporting
Burst

5. Casale Media – Good Popunder rates, seems great for few months then CPMs went down. Don’t know if it was seasonal or what, but since they are later fill in our system probably is part of the reason.

6. Value Click Media – Decent Popunder rates, lot of fill, don’t like there reporting and slow interface.

7. Realtech Network – LOW Cpms, bad interface, ok for final fill
Realtech

8. Robert Sherman - Terrible Reporting, LOW CPMs, ok for fill, one good thing they prepay in $25 increments, although you never no how much you going to make because the reporting is so bad.
Robert Sherman

Oops only 8, well Again this is based on our own experience with ad networks we have used. We’ll try to get more detailed but wanted to get discussion going with others…

Google Adsense (The Good)

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

AdSense allows website owners to earn money from their sites in a way that they couldn’t do before. All they have to do is put the AdSense code in their pages, and some visitors to the site will click on the ads that are displayed. The more visitors a site gets, the more people will click on the ads, and the more money the site owner will make. Because the ads are contextual, they match the content of the pages they are displayed on, which suits the advertisers because it drives people who are interested in their topic to their sites, and they only pay when people click on their ads.

Everyone is happy. Google makes lots of money, advertisers get lots of targeted traffic and only pay for ad impressions when someone clicks on them, Web users can find more things that they are interested in, and website owners can make anything from a small amount of money to a very large amount of money. Even the earnings from tiny websites can often offset or pay for the upkeep of the sites – hosting, for instance. Google created a system where everyone is a winner, and if people hadn’t taken advantage of it in ways that weren’t intended, everyone would still be happy.

Here endeth the “Good” side of AdSense. Google’s creation is excellent, but in launching it, they inadvertantly created something of a monster that just keeps growing.

Some people soon realised that they could capitalise on AdSense in ways that would be detrimental to the Web, to Web users, and to search engines, including Google itself. A new off-white, and sometimes positively black, industry was born.

Google Adsense (The bad)

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Made For AdSense sites (MFA sites)

Shortly after AdSense appeared, MFA sites started to appear.These are sites that are created for the sole purpose of making money from AdSense. Some of them contain genuine information and are useful, but most of them contain nothing of real value to Web users. The non-useful ones usually contain nothing but links to other sites – the links themselves being more AdSense ads – although some of them contain some real content that has been stolen from other websites. They are parasite websites that help nobody but their owners.

The few MFA sites that have been created with genuine, useful content are perfectly good. The rest (most of them) are parasites that make the Web a worse place for everyone except themselves. They are SEOed to rank well in the search engines’ search results, which wastes people’s time, and is annoying when a search result is clicked on, only to find another list of links to look through and click on. That’s not what people are searching for, and it’s not what people want. Occasionally, the MFA sites overwhelm the top search results, and it is a real pain trying to find something useful. That situation continues to get worse.


Arbitrage

Arbitrage is the purchase of something in one market for immediate resale in another market in order to profit from a price discrepancy. AdSense arbitrage sites are MFA sites that are created to be found in the AdWords system rather than in the search results. They advertise in AdWords, and, when a person clicks on one of their ads, they are taken to a page that offers more ads, but nothing of value.

They advertise on low cost-per-click keywords in AdWords, and their pages are designed to attract high cost-per-click AdSense ads. In many cases, they advertise on low cost topics and their pages are designed to attract high cost ads of a different topic, particularly when the high cost topic includes some of the same words, so that people can be fooled into clicking on the ads.

The only difference between this type of MFA site and the other type is that they operate in different ways. The other one seeks to get free traffic from the search results, while this one pays for the traffic in AdWords, but has to ensure that there is enough difference between the click cost and the click commission to make it worthwhile. Apart from that difference, this type is the same as the other type in that they both offer people nothing of value, and any non-ad content is usually stolen.

AdSense arbitrage sites are not as annoying as the normal MFA sites, because they don’t fool people in the generic search results. I’ve seen advertisers who are really mad about AdSense arbitrage, because they feel they are being cheated, and in some cases they are. I’ve also seen advertisers who are happy with it, because they feel that people who click on their ads in an arbitrager’s site, click because they are interested in what the advertiser is advertising. But I’ve never seen any ordinary Web user who is happy to land on a page that asks them to look through another list of links and choose again. They already did that in the search results, and they really don’t want to do it again. AdSense arbitraging is bad for Web users, and detrimental to the Web.

Both types of MFA sites are mushrooming, and, unless the search engines do something about it, they will continue to mushroom to the detriment of Web users, and the Web itself. Unfortunately, the search engines don’t appear to be inclined to do anything about it at the present time. They are not the keepers of the Web, and they are not the Web’s police, but the Web will continue to deteriorate until they take some action to prevent the MFA sites from cluttering up the organic search results, and from being displayed in AdWords and AdSense.